SASAqS medals

The society awards medals in gold, silver and bronze in recognition of outstanding contributions to the aquatic sciences.

Recipients

This is an incomplete list.

Name Medal Year
Tony RibbinkSilver1985
Brian AllansonGold
Mark ChutterGold1990
Marjorie ScottGold1993
Graham NobleGold
Jackie KingSilver1996
Arthur HarrisonGold1996
Paul SkeltonSilver1997
Kader AsmalGold1999
Charles BreenGold1999
Tally PalmerSilver1999
Bryan DaviesGold2003
Steve MitchellSilver2003
Bill RowlstonSilver2003
Jay O'KeeffeGold2004
Neels KleynhansSilver2004
Mary-Jean GabrielBronze2004
Annelise GerberBronze2004
Steve MitchellGold2009
Digby CyrusGold2011
Bruce EllenderBronze2012
Ryan WassermanBronze2013
Jenny DayGold2013
Pete AshtonGold2014
Alan WhitfieldGold2015
Janine AdamsSilver2015
O. Nelson OdumeBronze2015
Jackie KingGold2016
Tally PalmerGold2016
Johan van VurenGold2016
Tatenda DaluBronze2016
Rob HartGold2017
Mike CokeSilver2018
Guy BateGold2019
Cate BrownGold2021
Paul SkeltonGold2021
Olaf WeylGold2021
Mmabaledi BuxtonBronze2021
Anya VermaakBronze2021
Victor WepenerGold2022
Helen DallasGold2022
Dennis HughesGold2022
Takudzwa MadzivanziraBronze2022
(to be added)TBC2023
Jim TaylorSilver2024
Andrew BirkheadSilver2024
Mark GrahamGold2024

Medal award criteria

Eligibility is set out in section 6 of the SASAqS Constitution:

The bronze medal is intended for the best student thesis in a year, motivated by the supervisor and judged by the medals committee in the light of the examiners’ reports.

Standing Committee on Awards — 1999 clarifications

The Standing Committee on Awards met in 1999 and clarified some uncertainties in the constitutional wording. Not all awardees need be SASAqS members; this is at the Awards Committee’s discretion, but should be guided by the awardee having contributed to southern African ecosystems and/or having had some involvement with the society. The award for a major work need not have been peer reviewed in an international journal, as the work is not always of a research nature. There is no period of exclusion before a piece of work that was motivated for an award but turned down may be resubmitted. The Awards Committee does not have the power to upgrade or downgrade a nomination in terms of the medal to be awarded; this must be referred back to the proposer with a recommendation to resubmit in the appropriate category. Generally it was agreed that the committee should act in the spirit of the society on the strengths and merits of each motivation. Voting is by secret ballot: members receive nominations from the Awards Committee Secretary with a form to mark acceptance or rejection; the completed form is placed in an unmarked envelope inside a second envelope and posted to the Secretary, who collates the unmarked envelopes and forwards them to the Awards Committee Chairman.